Wilks, DOTS, IPF GL 계수를 이용해 체급이 다른 파워리프터를 비교하세요. 종목별 세부 내역과 1대1 비교를 제공합니다.
| 점수 | 선수 A | 선수 B |
|---|
Wilks 2020: 점수 = 총합 × 600 / (a + bx + cx² + dx³ + ex⁴ + fx⁵), 여기서 x는 체중(kg)입니다.
DOTS: 점수 = 총합 × 500 / (a + bx + cx² + dx³ + ex⁴). 체중은 항상 kg 기준입니다.
IPF GL 포인트는 IPF Goodlift 계수를 사용합니다 (raw 클래식 기준, 근사치).
Three coefficient systems run on the same squat, bench and deadlift total. Wilks uses the 2020 revision: score equals total times 600 divided by a fifth-degree polynomial in bodyweight in kilograms. DOTS uses total times 500 over a fourth-degree polynomial. IPF GL applies a different shape entirely — 100 divided by A minus B times e to the minus C times bodyweight, with A of 1199.72839, B of 1025.18162 and C of 0.00921 for men. Each has separate male and female coefficient sets.
Bodyweight and sex drive the coefficient, so those two fields change the score most. Bodyweight defaults to 83 kg against a 520 kg total, and the unit selector divides lb entries by 2.20462 before any formula runs — which is why the total is always reported back in kilograms. The compare toggle opens a second lifter with an independent bodyweight and sex, letting you settle whether a lighter lifter's smaller total actually beats a heavier one's.
These formulas exist to compare lifters near the middle of the bodyweight distribution and get progressively less trustworthy at the extremes, where the polynomials were fitted to thin data. Only one IPF GL variant is implemented — raw classic, full power — so equipped, bench-only and other events are not covered, and the tool's own notes describe it as an approximation. Sex is a binary dropdown because that is how the published coefficient tables are structured, not because it captures every competitor.
Both divide your total by a polynomial in bodyweight, but DOTS is a newer fit using a fourth-degree polynomial and a 500 multiplier, while Wilks 2020 uses fifth-degree terms and a 600 multiplier. They rank lifters slightly differently, especially at the very light and very heavy ends.
Either. The unit dropdown applies to bodyweight and all three lifts together, and pounds are divided by 2.20462 into kilograms before scoring. Do not mix units between fields, since one selector governs every input on the page.
Because all three coefficient systems are defined against kilograms. The tool converts your entries first, then reports the converted total so you can see exactly what went into the formula. Your original pound figures stay untouched in the input fields.
No. The IPF GL coefficients here are the raw classic, full-power set only. Equipped lifting and single-lift events use their own published coefficient tables, and applying the raw numbers to them would overstate the score.
The updated one. The coefficients are the Wilks 2020 revision, which the results table labels explicitly, and they produce different numbers from the original 1996 formula many older calculators still use. Compare scores only against others computed the same way.
One Rep Max (1RM) Calculator + % Chart
Estimate your 1RM with 5 formulas (Epley, Brzycki, Lombardi, O'Conner, Wathan) and a full %1RM training chart.
Barbell Plate Loading Calculator (kg / lb)
Plate math for any target weight, with available plate inventory, in kg or lb — for Olympic, women's and trap bars.
Macros from Calories Calculator (P / F / C in g)
Calculate grams of protein, fat and carbs from any calorie target with keto, balanced and high-protein presets.
Heart Rate, FTP & Pace Training Zone Calculator
Generate Z1–Z5 training zones from threshold heart rate, FTP or threshold pace for running, cycling and rowing.
Running Pace Converter & Race Time Predictor
Convert running pace between min/km and min/mi and predict your 5K, 10K, half and full marathon times.
Cycling Power to Speed Calculator
Estimate cycling speed from watts using bike weight, gradient, wind and surface drag.
